I recently saw
Star Trek Into Darkness and highly enjoyed it. It was a great adventure, humorous, touching and swung along at a great pace. However, there was one moment which threw me out of my pleasant enjoyment and this was a key piece of drama which relied on
gravity.
Please be aware that this will now discuss events from the end of the film, so only read on if you have seen the film or don't mind knowing more.....
Gravity: badly treated in films
Okay. The Enterprise is some 200,000km from the Earth, the Moon large in the background. Heavily damaged in a fire-fight the ship loses all main power and can no longer hold its position. So what happens? Apparently what happens is that the ship starts falling towards Earth, out of control and doomed to crash into the planet and kill everyone aboard!
What?! The ship is more than 200,000km away the Earth! How does gravity work in films? The ship reaches the Earth in around 10mins of film time. If we assume that the ship starts accelerating at 9.8m/s and there is nothing to slow it down, it would take around 1hr and 45mins to travel 200,000km! It would also be travelling at around 62km
per second. So it would pretty much go through the atmosphere in around 3 seconds before leaving a very large crater.
But that would be stupid too, as 9.8m/s only applies if an object is near the Earth's
surface. Every time you double the distance from the source of gravity, the power of gravity reduces by a multiple of four. The surface of the Earth is around 6,400km from its centre, so the Enterprise was 31 times the distance away. So the power of the Earth's gravity at this point was accelerating the Enterprise by 0.01m/s!
Hopefully by this time you see my point. In the film the writers and directors would have us believe that just because the Enterprise lost power, it suddenly careened out of control towards the Earth. This is massively implausible and for me expresses a black hole in the minds of Hollywood when it comes to science.
This first really hit my attention during
Lockout last year. This was again a highly entertaining film, starring Guy Pearce, and I would heartily recommend it to anyone who enjoys a Die-Hard style film. It is pretty dumb, but again it treated poor old gravity with a contempt I didn't know it deserved.
Lockout: fun but dumb
A space prison has been taken over by the prisoners and the crew killed. Now this space prison is no longer being actively controlled it is in such an unstable orbit that it will fall to the ground within 6 hours!
First of all, who puts any permanent structure into orbit around the Earth where it won't stay in orbit unless constant adjustments are made. That makes no sense. It's a massive waste of fuel and completely pointless. Next, assuming that even a modicum of sense was deployed and it was in a largely stable orbit which would decline over time, how would it decline in 6 hours? How strong is gravity here? Is the idea that anything which is not touching the ground is pretty much going to fall as fast as something you drop from your hand?
I am aware of the need for the suspension of disbelief in films, as well as for dramatic licence. I am not going to criticise the 'science' of warp travel and transporters, or the merits of space prisons. We take some things as given. However, I don't think that the basic laws of nature should be seen as a flexible sacrifice. It makes no sense that this should have happened. No-one is claiming space gadgets or some other plot device did it. Both of these examples simply rely on the 'fact' that things not touching the surface of the Earth fall towards it.
Idiots.